When is the old Nusach restored

From the posts about the word "choli" in Asher Yotzar I get the feeling that it is very well documented but still not the practiced Nusach. Am I mistaken? And if not, why is it not the practiced Nusach?

SRainus

Michael wrote: Our Rov holds that we should change back to the old Nusach if it was changes by censors or by maskilim

Considering that Ashkenaz poskim traditionally safeguarded the traditional Minhag Ashkenaz against even erudite and wise Rabbonim of other traditions, according to the Rov, if the changes were made by or made because of Polish Poskim, is even that sufficient reason for keeping the new nusach?

SRainus

Michael wrote: Changes that were made by Maskilim or by the censor our Rov holds we should change back, even if the changes were eventually adopted in Ashkenaz.

According to the Rov, who qualifies to be one of the Maskilim? Does Wolf Heidenheim, where it can be shown that he copied from Satanov, count? Does Zalman Hanne count? Read here what the Noda Bihuda had to write about Zalman Hanne. In a Haskama to קונטרס השגות עלסידור שערי תפילה של ר' זלמן הענא בעל בנין שלמה, the Noda Bihuda writes:

וקם אחריהם המדקדק הגדול שהיה מופלג מאד בחכמה זו בעל בנין שלמה. והדפיס סידור שקראו שערי תפילה. אמנם לרוב קנאתו באלו שקדמוהו שינה כמה דברים בזדון. וכמה דברים אגב חריפתא שבשתא. כי היה נקל בעיניו להמציא כללים חדשים אשר לא נזכר בהמדקדקים הראשונים. ולכך אף שהיה מופלג בחכמה זו אין לסמוך על מה שחידש

SRainus

Michael wrote: Our Rov holds that changes that eventually were adopted in the Ashkenaz Nusach, and have been practiced for many years, we do not change back, even if Lechatchila maybe Rabbonei Ashkenaz would not have made these changes, since now the changes have been done and this is the tradition - we do not change it (לא טוב אנוכי מאבותי). This is on condition that there is a (Rabbinical) source for this different Nusach and for the change. Changes that were made by Maskilim or by the censor our Rov holds we should change back, even if the changes were eventually adopted in Ashkenaz.

And if the Rabbinical source based himself on a Maskil, then the Rav is ready to argue with the Rabbinical source?

SRainus